Ongkos Terbang Pesawat Tempur

Ref:

Last week, Battleland bemoaned the increasing difficulty finding cost-per-flight-hour data for U.S. military aircraft.
In a flash, longtime defense watcher – from a perch on Capitol Hill, as well as a stint at the Government Accountability Office – Winslow Wheeler piped up to say he recently sought, and got, such data from the Air Force comptroller’s office.
He adds that he has tried to get similar data from the Navy, without luck. What’s up with that, Admiral Kirby?
The Air Force provided Wheeler with cost-per-flight-hour for dozens of aircraft.
Here’s a sample of what it costs to keep these Air Force aircraft airborne for one hour last year (the so-called “ownership” cost-per-flight-hour, which includes modifications):
A-10C Warthog Attack Plane — $17,716

A-10C

AC-130U Spooky Gunship — $45,986

USAF

B-1B Lancer Bomber — $57,807

USAF

B-2A Spirit Stealth Bomber — $169,313

USAF

B-52H Stratofortress Bomber — $69,708

USAF

C-130J Hercules Cargo Plane — $14,014

USAF

C-17 Globemaster Cargo Plane — $23,811

USAF

C-20B VIP Plane (Senior Pentagon Officials) — $32,212

USAF

C-32A VIP Plane (Vice President, Cabinet Officers) — $42,936

USAF

C-5B Galaxy Cargo Plane — $78,817

C-5A/B GALAXY, CARGO, AIRCRAFT, Photo by: Mr. Ken HackmanPrimary function: Long-range, heavy logistics transport. Contractor: Lockheed-Georgia Co. Speed: More than 500 mph at 25,000 ft. Dimensions: Wingspan 222 ft. 9 in., length 247 ft. 10 in., height at tail 65 ft. 1 in., stabilizer span 68 ft. 9 in., cargo compartment--height 13 ft. 6 in., width 19 ft. Range: 5,259 miles with 112,600 lbs. cargo at 507 mph. Crew: six.

USAF

CV-22B Osprey Tilt-Rotor — $83,256

USAF

E-3B Sentry AWACS Radar Plane — $39,587

USAF

E-4B Flying Headquarters — $163,485

USAF

F-15C Eagle Fighter — $41,921

USAF

F-16C Viper Fighter — $22,514

USAF

F-22A Raptor Fighter — $68,362

USAF

HH-60G Pave Hawk Helicopter — $24,475

USAF

KC-10A Extender Tanker — $21,170

USAF

MC-130H Combat Talon II Special Operations Plane — $32,752

USAF

MQ-1B Predator Drone — $3,679

USAF

MQ-9A Reaper Drone — $4,762

USAF

RQ-4B Global Hawk Drone — $49,089

USAF

T-38C Talon Jet Trainer — $9,355

USAF

T-6A Texan II Turboprop Trainer — $2,235

USAF

U-2 Dragon Lady Spy Plane — $30,813

USAF

UH-1N Huey Helicopter — $13,634

UH-1N Huey, Helicopter, aircraft, Photo by MSgt Ken Hammond.<br /><br /><br /> Primary function: Support of distinguished visitors, VIPs missile sites and ranges. Contractor: Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. Speed: 150 mph. Dimensions: Length 57 ft. 3 in., width 9 ft. 1 in., height 12 ft. 10 in., diameter of main rotor 48 ft., diameter of tail rotor 8 ft. 6 in. Range: 250 miles. Armament: Two 7.62mm machine guns. Crew: two

USAF

VC-25A Air Force One — $161,591
vc_25a

Comments

The Difference Between LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 Home Edition (#31313) and LEGO MINDSTORMS Education EV3 (#45544)

http://robotsquare.com/2013/11/25/difference-between-ev3-home-edition-and-education-ev3/ This article covers the difference between the LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 Home Edition and LEGO MINDSTORMS Education EV3 products. Other articles in the ‘difference between’ series: * The difference and compatibility between EV3 and NXT ( link ) * The difference between NXT Home Edition and NXT Education products ( link ) One robotics platform, two targets The LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 robotics platform has been developed for two different target audiences. We have home users (children and hobbyists) and educational users (students and teachers). LEGO has designed a base set for each group, as well as several add on sets. There isn’t a clear line between home users and educational users, though. It’s fine to use the Education set at home, and it’s fine to use the Home Edition set at school. This article aims to clarify the differences between the two product lines so you can decide which

Let’s ban PowerPoint in lectures – it makes students more stupid and professors more boring

https://theconversation.com/lets-ban-powerpoint-in-lectures-it-makes-students-more-stupid-and-professors-more-boring-36183 Reading bullet points off a screen doesn't teach anyone anything. Author Bent Meier Sørensen Professor in Philosophy and Business at Copenhagen Business School Disclosure Statement Bent Meier Sørensen does not work for, consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations. The Conversation is funded by CSIRO, Melbourne, Monash, RMIT, UTS, UWA, ACU, ANU, ASB, Baker IDI, Canberra, CDU, Curtin, Deakin, ECU, Flinders, Griffith, the Harry Perkins Institute, JCU, La Trobe, Massey, Murdoch, Newcastle, UQ, QUT, SAHMRI, Swinburne, Sydney, UNDA, UNE, UniSA, UNSW, USC, USQ, UTAS, UWS, VU and Wollongong.

Logic Analyzer with STM32 Boards

https://sysprogs.com/w/how-we-turned-8-popular-stm32-boards-into-powerful-logic-analyzers/ How We Turned 8 Popular STM32 Boards into Powerful Logic Analyzers March 23, 2017 Ivan Shcherbakov The idea of making a “soft logic analyzer” that will run on top of popular prototyping boards has been crossing my mind since we first got acquainted with the STM32 Discovery and Nucleo boards. The STM32 GPIO is blazingly fast and the built-in DMA controller looks powerful enough to handle high bandwidths. So having that in mind, we spent several months perfecting both software and firmware side and here is what we got in the end. Capturing the signals The main challenge when using a microcontroller like STM32 as a core of a logic analyzer is dealing with sampling irregularities. Unlike FPGA-based analyzers, the microcontroller has to share the same resources to load instructions from memory, read/write the program state and capture the external inputs from the G

Jurnal Singkat

Search This Blog