Skip to main content

Call for Paper: CFP: Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Komputer

http://jtsiskom.undip.ac.id/index.php/jtsiskom/announcement/view/56

Call for Paper: CFP: Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Komputer (JTSiskom, ISSN:2338-0403)

Yth. Dosen / Peneliti,
Kami informasikan bahwa Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Komputer (JTSiskom, ISSN:2338-0403, http://jtsiskom.undip.ac.id/index.php/jtsiskom) adalah terbitan berkala online nasional sebagai media daring untuk mempublikasikan artikel-artikel ilmiah dari hasil penelitian dan pengembangan di bidang sistem tertanam/embedded, jaringan dan infrastruktur server, dan algoritma komputing. Lihat [http://jtsiskom.undip.ac.id/index.php/jtsiskom/about/editorialPolicies#focusAndScope].
Kami mengundang Anda untuk mengirimkan artikel ilmiah ke JTSiskom untuk terbitan nomor berikut:
  • Volume 6, Nomor 1, Tahun 2018: Terbit 31 Januari 2017, Batas pengiriman: 3 Desember 2017
  • Volume 6, Nomor 2, Tahun 2018: Terbit 30 April 2018, Batas pengiriman: 3 Maret 2018
  • Volume 6, Nomor 3, Tahun 2018: Terbit 31 Juli 2018, Batas pengiriman: 3 Juni 2018
  • Volume 6, Nomor 4, Tahun 2018: Terbit 31 Oktober 2018, Batas pengiriman: 3 September 2018
Artikel yang telah dinyatakan diterima dan telah dilakukan layout akan diterbitkan dalam nomor In-Progress (tersedia online, terindeks dan dapat disitasi) sebelum nomor regular terbit. JTSiskom telah terindeks DOAJ, Google Scholar, Neliti dan OneSearch.id Perpusnas. Lihat daftar pengindeks.
Artikel harus dikirimkan ke Editor JTSiskom secara online lewat portal jurnal JTSiskom di [http://jtsiskom.undip.ac.id/index.php/jtsiskom/about/submission]
Artikel-artikel yang dimuat di jurnal ini, sudah melalui proses review setidaknya oleh 2 orang reviewer secara single-blind. Review dilakukan selama 4-8 minggu sejak artikel diterima [http://jtsiskom.undip.ac.id/index.php/jtsiskom/about/editorialPolicies#peerReviewProcess]. Keputusan diterima tidaknya artikel menjadi kewenangan ketua editor berdasarkan rekomendasi dari para reviewer. Pemeriksaan unsur plagiasi dilakukan melalui penelusuran di Google Scholar dan Turnitin.
Artikel yang dikirimkan harus sesuai dengan Petunjuk Penulisan JTSiskom (http://jtsiskom.undip.ac.id/index.php/jtsiskom/about/submissions#authorGuidelines). Anda diharapkan menggunakan template JTSiskom yang tersedia di portal JTSiskom dan dapat diakses secara terbuka (open access).
Setiap artikel yang dikirimkan ke editorial JTSiskom tidak dipungut biaya apapun (gratis - no page charge) termasuk gratis biaya pemrosesan artikel. Biaya publikasi seluruhnya ditanggung penerbit jurnal JTSiskom [http://jtsiskom.undip.ac.id/index.php/jtsiskom/about/editorialPolicies#custom-0].


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Difference Between LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 Home Edition (#31313) and LEGO MINDSTORMS Education EV3 (#45544)

http://robotsquare.com/2013/11/25/difference-between-ev3-home-edition-and-education-ev3/ This article covers the difference between the LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 Home Edition and LEGO MINDSTORMS Education EV3 products. Other articles in the ‘difference between’ series: * The difference and compatibility between EV3 and NXT ( link ) * The difference between NXT Home Edition and NXT Education products ( link ) One robotics platform, two targets The LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 robotics platform has been developed for two different target audiences. We have home users (children and hobbyists) and educational users (students and teachers). LEGO has designed a base set for each group, as well as several add on sets. There isn’t a clear line between home users and educational users, though. It’s fine to use the Education set at home, and it’s fine to use the Home Edition set at school. This article aims to clarify the differences between the two product lines so you can decide which
1 comment
Read more

Let’s ban PowerPoint in lectures – it makes students more stupid and professors more boring

https://theconversation.com/lets-ban-powerpoint-in-lectures-it-makes-students-more-stupid-and-professors-more-boring-36183 Reading bullet points off a screen doesn't teach anyone anything. Author Bent Meier Sørensen Professor in Philosophy and Business at Copenhagen Business School Disclosure Statement Bent Meier Sørensen does not work for, consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations. The Conversation is funded by CSIRO, Melbourne, Monash, RMIT, UTS, UWA, ACU, ANU, ASB, Baker IDI, Canberra, CDU, Curtin, Deakin, ECU, Flinders, Griffith, the Harry Perkins Institute, JCU, La Trobe, Massey, Murdoch, Newcastle, UQ, QUT, SAHMRI, Swinburne, Sydney, UNDA, UNE, UniSA, UNSW, USC, USQ, UTAS, UWS, VU and Wollongong.
Post a Comment
Read more

Logic Analyzer with STM32 Boards

https://sysprogs.com/w/how-we-turned-8-popular-stm32-boards-into-powerful-logic-analyzers/ How We Turned 8 Popular STM32 Boards into Powerful Logic Analyzers March 23, 2017 Ivan Shcherbakov The idea of making a “soft logic analyzer” that will run on top of popular prototyping boards has been crossing my mind since we first got acquainted with the STM32 Discovery and Nucleo boards. The STM32 GPIO is blazingly fast and the built-in DMA controller looks powerful enough to handle high bandwidths. So having that in mind, we spent several months perfecting both software and firmware side and here is what we got in the end. Capturing the signals The main challenge when using a microcontroller like STM32 as a core of a logic analyzer is dealing with sampling irregularities. Unlike FPGA-based analyzers, the microcontroller has to share the same resources to load instructions from memory, read/write the program state and capture the external inputs from the G
Post a Comment
Read more