Skip to main content

KHA DAHLAN DAN PEMBENAHAN SISTEM PERJALANAN HAJI DI MASA KOLONIAL

 

https://www.facebook.com/diahpwijaya2/posts/2245148252281086
 
KHA DAHLAN DAN PEMBENAHAN SISTEM PERJALANAN HAJI DI MASA KOLONIAL
==============================
Empat kali berhaji dan bermukim di Makkah, yaitu tahun 1883-1888, 1890-1893, 1903-1905, dan 1914-1915, membuat KHA Dahlan memikirkan perlunya perbaikan sistem perjalanan haji. Karena di masa itu, perjalanan haji jamaah Hindia Belanda termasuk kategori sangat buruk dan sangat merugikan jamaah.
Pemikiran dan keprihatinan ini kemudian membuat KHA Dahlan pada tahun 1921 mengutus salah satu muridnya, yaitu Fakhrudin, untuk melaksanakan ibadah haji dan kemudian menemui Raja Syarif Husein. Hal ini dikarenakan KHA Dahlan sendiri sedang disibukkan dengan pertumbuhan cabang2 Muhammadiyah di pelosok negeri di tahun yang sama, setelah terbitnya surat dari pemerintah Hindia, yang secara resmi telah memberi ijin kepada Hoofdbestur Muhammadiyah untuk pendirian cabang2 Muhammadiyah di seluruh pelosok Hindia Belanda. Dan di tahun yang sama pula, publikasi2 gerakan Muhammadiyah sedang gencar2nya dilakukan ke seluruh penjuru negeri melalui majalah Soeara Moehammadijah dan leaflet2 yang dicetak di Percetakan Persatoean milik Muhammadiyah, sehingga KHA Dahlan tidak berangkat sendiri menemui Raja.
Dalam kesempatan ini, Fakhrudin, selain menghadap Raja Syarif Husein untuk membicarakan tentang perbaikan sistem perjalanan haji, sekaligus memperkenalkan persyarikatan Muhammadiyah kepada Raja.
Sejak saat itu terjalinlah hubungan baik antara kerajaan Arab dengan Muhammadiyah.
Setelah wafatnya pada 23 Februari 1923, keinginan KHA Dahlan untuk perbaikan sistem perjalanan haji kemudian dilanjutkan oleh murid-muridnya dan anak cucunya. Salah satunya diwujudkan melalui Hasil Keputusan Majelis Tarjih untuk menginisiasi perjalanan haji Indonesia pada tahun 1950-an (sumber : KH. KRT. Wardan Dipaningrat, cucu menantu KHA Dahlan, Penghulu Kraton Ngayogyakarta Hadiningrat), dan terbitnya Kitab Haji melalui Putusan Tarjih dalam Muktamar Khususi ke-28 tahun 1953 di Medan, dalam rangka Muktamar Muhammadiyah ke-32 di Purwokerto tahun 1953.
☀🇮🇩☀🇮🇩☀🇮🇩☀
By: Diah Purnamasari (cicit KHA Dahlan)
Sumber:
- Blog Muhammadiyah Studies
- Timeline KHA Dahlan dan Muhammadiyah dari tahun 1868 s/d 1925; Buku Silsilah KHA Dahlan hal. 433 (Revisi akhir 2019)
- Himpunan Putusan Tarjih Jilid I
- Sesepuh Keluarga.
Dalam rangka Milad Muhammadiyah ke 110 tahun Hijriyah
(8 Dzuhijjah 1330H - 8 Dzulhijjah 1440H), dan menyambut Muktamar Muhammadiyah ke-48 di Surakarta (2020)
"Semoga Muhammadiyah akan semakin memajukan Indonesia dan mencerahkan semesta"
Aamiin 🤲🤲🤲

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Difference Between LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 Home Edition (#31313) and LEGO MINDSTORMS Education EV3 (#45544)

http://robotsquare.com/2013/11/25/difference-between-ev3-home-edition-and-education-ev3/ This article covers the difference between the LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 Home Edition and LEGO MINDSTORMS Education EV3 products. Other articles in the ‘difference between’ series: * The difference and compatibility between EV3 and NXT ( link ) * The difference between NXT Home Edition and NXT Education products ( link ) One robotics platform, two targets The LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 robotics platform has been developed for two different target audiences. We have home users (children and hobbyists) and educational users (students and teachers). LEGO has designed a base set for each group, as well as several add on sets. There isn’t a clear line between home users and educational users, though. It’s fine to use the Education set at home, and it’s fine to use the Home Edition set at school. This article aims to clarify the differences between the two product lines so you can decide which

Let’s ban PowerPoint in lectures – it makes students more stupid and professors more boring

https://theconversation.com/lets-ban-powerpoint-in-lectures-it-makes-students-more-stupid-and-professors-more-boring-36183 Reading bullet points off a screen doesn't teach anyone anything. Author Bent Meier Sørensen Professor in Philosophy and Business at Copenhagen Business School Disclosure Statement Bent Meier Sørensen does not work for, consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations. The Conversation is funded by CSIRO, Melbourne, Monash, RMIT, UTS, UWA, ACU, ANU, ASB, Baker IDI, Canberra, CDU, Curtin, Deakin, ECU, Flinders, Griffith, the Harry Perkins Institute, JCU, La Trobe, Massey, Murdoch, Newcastle, UQ, QUT, SAHMRI, Swinburne, Sydney, UNDA, UNE, UniSA, UNSW, USC, USQ, UTAS, UWS, VU and Wollongong.

Logic Analyzer with STM32 Boards

https://sysprogs.com/w/how-we-turned-8-popular-stm32-boards-into-powerful-logic-analyzers/ How We Turned 8 Popular STM32 Boards into Powerful Logic Analyzers March 23, 2017 Ivan Shcherbakov The idea of making a “soft logic analyzer” that will run on top of popular prototyping boards has been crossing my mind since we first got acquainted with the STM32 Discovery and Nucleo boards. The STM32 GPIO is blazingly fast and the built-in DMA controller looks powerful enough to handle high bandwidths. So having that in mind, we spent several months perfecting both software and firmware side and here is what we got in the end. Capturing the signals The main challenge when using a microcontroller like STM32 as a core of a logic analyzer is dealing with sampling irregularities. Unlike FPGA-based analyzers, the microcontroller has to share the same resources to load instructions from memory, read/write the program state and capture the external inputs from the G