Skip to main content

Russia at risk of becoming failed state, say foreign policy experts

 

 https://www.ft.com/content/6ceb6331-07a0-4b1f-b777-3034b288a3be

Nearly half of top foreign policy experts think Russia will become a failed state or break up by 2033, while a large majority expects China to try to take Taiwan by force, according to a new survey by the Atlantic Council that points to a decade of global tumult ahead.

Forty-six per cent of the 167 experts responding to the think-tank said Russia’s failure or break-up could happen in the next 10 years. In a separate question, 40 per cent pointed to Russia as a country they expected to break up for reasons including “revolution, civil war or political disintegration” over that time.

“Ukraine clearly highlights the possibility of internal problems for Russia, and the possibility that the war itself might have boomerang effects for not only its leadership, but for the country as a whole,” said Peter Engelke, the Atlantic Council’s deputy director of foresight who helped to design and interpret the survey.

Western officials say Russia has been significantly weakened by its invasion of Ukraine 11 months ago, including by sanctions and export controls. Economists believe Russia’s productive capacity is steadily degrading as a result of the punitive measures, pushing the country back decades.

Russian president Vladimir Putin has begun to publicly acknowledge that Moscow is facing setbacks in Ukraine and that the conflict will take a long time. The US and its western allies have pledged to support Ukraine for as long as it takes, with all parties making plans for the war to continue for years.

Even as Europe is seeing the biggest land conflict since the second world war, a majority of the experts polled said they did not believe Russia and Nato would directly engage in a military conflict in the next decade.

However, backing increasingly dire warnings by US officials that China will launch a military offensive to retake Taiwan, 70 per cent of respondents predicted Beijing would do so in the next 10 years.

American military commanders have pointed to 2027, the 100th anniversary of the founding of China’s People’s Liberation Army, as a possible invasion date. However, some officials have intensified their warnings about Beijing’s intentions over the past year and said that an invasion was possible before 2024.

US president Joe Biden has repeatedly said Washington will defend Taiwan from a Chinese attack, even as the US has historically tried to avoid spelling out what it would do to deter both sides from acting.

Other findings add to a picture of global disarray. Nearly 90 per cent of respondents believe at least one additional country will obtain nuclear weapons by 2033. Sixty-eight per cent of them said Iran would be most likely to obtain a nuclear weapon, coming as prospects for reviving a nuclear deal between six world powers and Iran have become increasingly dim. Injecting some optimism, though, 58 per cent of the experts said they believed nuclear weapons would remain unused over the next 10 years.

The foreign policy experts also predicted some degree of American decline. While 71 per cent of those polled predicted the US would continue to be the world’s dominant military power by 2033, just 31 per cent believe that the US will be the number one diplomatic power and 33 per cent the pre-eminent economic one.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Difference Between LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 Home Edition (#31313) and LEGO MINDSTORMS Education EV3 (#45544)

http://robotsquare.com/2013/11/25/difference-between-ev3-home-edition-and-education-ev3/ This article covers the difference between the LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 Home Edition and LEGO MINDSTORMS Education EV3 products. Other articles in the ‘difference between’ series: * The difference and compatibility between EV3 and NXT ( link ) * The difference between NXT Home Edition and NXT Education products ( link ) One robotics platform, two targets The LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 robotics platform has been developed for two different target audiences. We have home users (children and hobbyists) and educational users (students and teachers). LEGO has designed a base set for each group, as well as several add on sets. There isn’t a clear line between home users and educational users, though. It’s fine to use the Education set at home, and it’s fine to use the Home Edition set at school. This article aims to clarify the differences between the two product lines so you can decide which

Let’s ban PowerPoint in lectures – it makes students more stupid and professors more boring

https://theconversation.com/lets-ban-powerpoint-in-lectures-it-makes-students-more-stupid-and-professors-more-boring-36183 Reading bullet points off a screen doesn't teach anyone anything. Author Bent Meier Sørensen Professor in Philosophy and Business at Copenhagen Business School Disclosure Statement Bent Meier Sørensen does not work for, consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations. The Conversation is funded by CSIRO, Melbourne, Monash, RMIT, UTS, UWA, ACU, ANU, ASB, Baker IDI, Canberra, CDU, Curtin, Deakin, ECU, Flinders, Griffith, the Harry Perkins Institute, JCU, La Trobe, Massey, Murdoch, Newcastle, UQ, QUT, SAHMRI, Swinburne, Sydney, UNDA, UNE, UniSA, UNSW, USC, USQ, UTAS, UWS, VU and Wollongong.

Logic Analyzer with STM32 Boards

https://sysprogs.com/w/how-we-turned-8-popular-stm32-boards-into-powerful-logic-analyzers/ How We Turned 8 Popular STM32 Boards into Powerful Logic Analyzers March 23, 2017 Ivan Shcherbakov The idea of making a “soft logic analyzer” that will run on top of popular prototyping boards has been crossing my mind since we first got acquainted with the STM32 Discovery and Nucleo boards. The STM32 GPIO is blazingly fast and the built-in DMA controller looks powerful enough to handle high bandwidths. So having that in mind, we spent several months perfecting both software and firmware side and here is what we got in the end. Capturing the signals The main challenge when using a microcontroller like STM32 as a core of a logic analyzer is dealing with sampling irregularities. Unlike FPGA-based analyzers, the microcontroller has to share the same resources to load instructions from memory, read/write the program state and capture the external inputs from the G