http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/12/opinion/the-importance-of-recreational-math.html
This reflects a sea change in mathematics itself, where computationally intense fields have been gaining increasing prominence in the past few decades. Also, Sudoku-type puzzles, so addictive and easily generated by computers, have squeezed out one-of-a-kind “insight” puzzles, which are much harder to design — and solve. Yet Mr. Gardner’s work lives on, through websites that render it in the visual and animated forms favored by today’s audiences, through a constellation of his books that continue to sell, and through biannual “Gathering 4 Gardner” recreational math conferences.
Baltimore — IN 1975, a San Diego woman named Marjorie Rice
read in her son’s Scientific American magazine that there were only
eight known pentagonal shapes that could entirely tile, or tessellate, a
plane. Despite having had no math beyond high school, she resolved to
find another. By 1977, she’d discovered not just one but four new
tessellations — a result noteworthy enough to be published the following year in a mathematics journal.
The
article that turned Ms. Rice into an amateur researcher was by the
legendary polymath Martin Gardner. His “Mathematical Games” series,
which ran in Scientific American for more than 25 years, introduced
millions worldwide to the joys of recreational mathematics. I read him
in Mumbai as an undergraduate, and even dug up his original 1956 column
on “hexaflexagons” (folded paper hexagons that can be flexed to reveal different flowerlike faces) to construct some myself.
“Recreational
math” might sound like an oxymoron to some, but the term can broadly
include such immensely popular puzzles as Sudoku and KenKen, in addition
to various games and brain teasers. The qualifying characteristics are
that no advanced mathematical knowledge like calculus be required, and
the activity engage enough of the same logical and deductive skills used
in mathematics.
Unlike
Sudoku, which always has the same format and gets easier with practice,
the disparate puzzles that Mr. Gardner favored required different,
inventive techniques to crack. The solution in such puzzles usually pops
up in its entirety, through a flash of insight, rather than emerging
steadily via step-by-step deduction as in Sudoku. An example: How can
you identify a single counterfeit penny, slightly lighter than the rest,
from a group of nine, in only two weighings?
Mr.
Gardner’s great genius lay in using such basic puzzles to lure readers
into extensions requiring pattern recognition and generalization, where
they were doing real math. For instance, once you solve the nine coin
puzzle above, you should be able to figure it out for 27 coins, or 81,
or any power of three, in fact. This is how math works, how recreational
questions can quickly lead to research problems and striking,
unexpected discoveries.
A
famous illustration of this was a riddle posed by the citizens of
Konigsberg, Germany, on whether there was a loop through their town
traversing each of its seven bridges only once. In solving the problem,
the mathematician Leonhard Euler abstracted the city map by representing
each land mass by a node and each bridge by a line segment. Not only
did his method generalize to any number of bridges, but it also laid the
foundation for graph theory, a subject essential to web searches and
other applications.
With
the diversity of entertainment choices available nowadays, Mr.
Gardner’s name may no longer ring a bell. The few students in my current
batch who say they still do mathematical puzzles seem partial to a
website called Project Euler, whose computational problems require not just mathematical insight but also programming skill.
This reflects a sea change in mathematics itself, where computationally intense fields have been gaining increasing prominence in the past few decades. Also, Sudoku-type puzzles, so addictive and easily generated by computers, have squeezed out one-of-a-kind “insight” puzzles, which are much harder to design — and solve. Yet Mr. Gardner’s work lives on, through websites that render it in the visual and animated forms favored by today’s audiences, through a constellation of his books that continue to sell, and through biannual “Gathering 4 Gardner” recreational math conferences.
Comments
Post a Comment