Compared to the hectic rush of our bipedal world, a plant’s life may
appear an oasis of tranquility. But look a little closer. The voracious
appetites of pests put plants under constant stress: They have to fight
just to stay alive.
And fight they do. Far from being passive
victims, plants have evolved potent defenses: chemical compounds that
serve as toxins, signal an escalating attack, and solicit help from
unlikely allies.
However, all of this security comes at a cost:
energy and other resources that plants could otherwise use for growth
and repair. So to balance the budget, plants have to be selective about
how and when to deploy their chemical arsenal. Here are five tactics
they’ve developed to ward off their insect foes without sacrificing
their own wellbeing. Warning Flares
Rather
than pump out chemical defenses 24-7 (a waste of resources), plants
hold off production until an attack is underway. As soon as an insect
bites a leaf, the leaf sounds the alarm by emitting volatiles—chemical
flares that tell other parts of the plant, as well as its neighbors, to
start manning the barricades.
This early warning system works via
a cascade of molecular events. First, it triggers the release of
“jasmonate” hormones, which in turn break down proteins known as JAZ.
These proteins silence genes that direct the manufacture of various
toxic and protective chemicals. By eliminating JAZ, jasmonate hormones
free these genes to express themselves, thus powering up a plant’s
weapons assembly line.
Plants also make use of underground
networks to warn each other of impending danger. Many species have a
symbiotic relationship with a soil-borne fungus, which penetrates the
outer layers of a plant’s roots, feeding off its carbon stores and
helping it take up vital nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus in
return. The fungus grows by sending out long, threadlike branches called
hyphae, which colonize nearby plants, forming vast underground webs.
In
experiments with bean plants, when researchers placed aphids on a plant
encased in a polythene bag (so it couldn’t broadcast warnings by air),
other plants hooked up to the subterranean fungal web began churning out
defensive compounds. Their unconnected neighbors, however, did not. The
fungus appears to work like a biological Internet, carrying vital
intelligence from plant to plant. Calls for Backup
Plants
also conserve resources by recruiting allies to fight some of their
battles for them. Among a plant’s armaments are volatiles that beckon
predators of its insect attackers.
When caterpillars graze
European maize, for example, the plants emit the volatile
β-caryophyllene, which attracts parasitic wasps. The wasps lay their
eggs inside the caterpillars, slowing their feeding and eventually, when
the eggs hatch a few weeks later, killing them. European maize also
releases β-caryophyllene below ground in response to rootworm attacks.
This signal drifts through pores in the soil, calling to predatory
roundworms: “Dinner’s ready, come and get it!”
In some cases,
however, a call for help can invite unwelcome guests. Maize varieties
cultivated in the United States, for example, have lost the ability to
produce β-caryophyllene, leaving them more vulnerable to insect attacks.
But when researchers restored the gene responsible for producing this
chemical in laboratory plants, their roots became infested with a
pathogenic fungus. The fungus, it seemed, had evolved to recognize
β-caryophyllene as an invitation, presenting the maize with a tough
choice: Keep its wasp and worm allies, and succumb to the fungus—or take its chances against the herbivores. Booby Traps
Why
go to the trouble of firing weapons willy-nilly when you can lure your
attacker into a carefully set trap? Plants in the Brassicaceae family
(including broccoli, cabbage, and mustard) store seemingly harmless
compounds known as glucosinolates in cellular compartments next to
stores of enzymes called myrosinase. The two reserves are separated only
by a thin cell wall. When an unsuspecting herbivore chews through this
wall, the myrosinase enzymes mix with the glucosinolates, catalyzing
chemical reactions that engulf the attacker in a toxic cloud. (It’s
these reactions that give Brassicaceae species their characteristic
bitter flavors and antioxidant properties.)
Only when these booby
traps are effective, however, will plants put more resources into
creating them. When chewing insects such as caterpillars activate the
traps, the resulting damage induces the plant to ramp up glucosinolate
production. However, sucking insects such as aphids, which avoid setting
off the traps by feeding through a needlelike tube, have little effect:
The plant doesn’t waste resources on ineffective weapons. Spy Games
Some
plants have learned the communication codes of their enemies and use
them to spread false information. Aphids, for example, release the
pheromone β-farnesene when a predator attacks. This warning tells other
aphids in the area that they’ve been rumbled and it’s time to skedaddle.
Plants often emit β-farnesene during an aphid attack, perhaps in an
attempt to scare off their aggressors by aping their distress call. But
not just any β-farnesene signal will do.
In most cases, plants
release the pheromone in a steady stream as part of a mixture of
defensive volatiles, and aphids have learned to ignore it. The wild
potato, however, has found a way to modify this signal to successful
effect: It stores the pheromone in delicate bulbs on the ends of tiny
leaf hairs. When an aphid lands on the leaf, its legs stick to the
leaf’s tacky surface. As the aphid thrashes about trying to free itself,
it breaks the bulbs, releasing β-farnesene in bursts that seem to mimic
an aphid’s pulsed alarm call. Emergency First Aid
During
a hard-fought battle, a plant must tend to its injuries. A range of
compounds known as green leaf volatiles act as antiseptics, protecting
damaged tissue against bacterial or fungal infection. (These volatiles,
which make up the fragrance of freshly cut grass, send another warning
to neighboring plants, reminding them that danger is at hand.)
An
injured plant also produces traumatic acid, known as the “wound
hormone,” which stimulates cell division to close up a laceration in
much the same way that blood clots in an animal’s wound. These responses
happen within minutes of attack: Plants begin patching themselves up
while still fighting off invaders. A plant must therefore constantly
decide how to divide its resources between defense and regeneration.
And
as the struggle between plants and insects plays out generation after
generation, each opponent is continuously revising its playbook to try
to gain the upper hand. Insects, for example, are beginning to evolve
antidotes to plants’ various defenses, including the ability to
neutralize toxins or even steal them for their own ends, thus pressuring
plants to develop new tactics. This war is a Red Queen’s arms race:
Both sides are running at full tilt just to stand still.
Mike
Newland is a post-doctoral research assistant at the University of East
Anglia, looking at interactions between the biosphere and atmosphere.
https://sysprogs.com/w/how-we-turned-8-popular-stm32-boards-into-powerful-logic-analyzers/ How We Turned 8 Popular STM32 Boards into Powerful Logic Analyzers March 23, 2017 Ivan Shcherbakov The idea of making a “soft logic analyzer” that will run on top of popular prototyping boards has been crossing my mind since we first got acquainted with the STM32 Discovery and Nucleo boards. The STM32 GPIO is blazingly fast and the built-in DMA controller looks powerful enough to handle high bandwidths. So having that in mind, we spent several months perfecting both software and firmware side and here is what we got in the end. Capturing the signals The main challenge when using a microcontroller like STM32 as a core of a logic analyzer is dealing with sampling irregularities. Unlike FPGA-based analyzers, the microcontroller has to share the same resources to load instructions from memory, read/write th...
http://robotsquare.com/2013/11/25/difference-between-ev3-home-edition-and-education-ev3/ This article covers the difference between the LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 Home Edition and LEGO MINDSTORMS Education EV3 products. Other articles in the ‘difference between’ series: * The difference and compatibility between EV3 and NXT ( link ) * The difference between NXT Home Edition and NXT Education products ( link ) One robotics platform, two targets The LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 robotics platform has been developed for two different target audiences. We have home users (children and hobbyists) and educational users (students and teachers). LEGO has designed a base set for each group, as well as several add on sets. There isn’t a clear line between home users and educational users, though. It’s fine to use the Education set at home, and it’s fine to use the Home Edition set at school. This article aims to clarify the differences between the two product lines so you can decide which...
https://theconversation.com/lets-ban-powerpoint-in-lectures-it-makes-students-more-stupid-and-professors-more-boring-36183 Reading bullet points off a screen doesn't teach anyone anything. Author Bent Meier Sørensen Professor in Philosophy and Business at Copenhagen Business School Disclosure Statement Bent Meier Sørensen does not work for, consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations. The Conversation is funded by CSIRO, Melbourne, Monash, RMIT, UTS, UWA, ACU, ANU, ASB, Baker IDI, Canberra, CDU, Curtin, Deakin, ECU, Flinders, Griffith, the Harry Perkins Institute, JCU, La Trobe, Massey, Murdoch, Newcastle, UQ, QUT, SAHMRI, Swinburne, Sydney, UNDA, UNE, UniSA, UNSW, USC, USQ, UTAS, UWS, VU and Wollongong. ...
Comments
Post a Comment