Skip to main content

Asyari Usman: GAR ITB Jangan Plintat-Plintut, Bantah Ini Bantah Itu

 https://www.tangerangnet.com/2021/02/asyari-usman-gar-itb-jangan-plintat.html

*ALUMNI ITB BENAR BENAR TERCEMAR OLEH ULAH SEGELINTIR ALUMNI BUZZER YANG TERGABUNG DALAM GAR ITB*
*_KENAPA IA ITB DIAM ????_*
*GAR* ITB: *Jangan Plintat-Plintut, Bantah Ini Bantah Itu*
_By Asyari Usman_
Gerakan Anti Radikal (GAR) Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB) sekarang mengatakan bahwa mereka tidak melaporkan Prof Din Syamsuddin ke Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara (KASN) atas dugaan radikalisme. Melainkan terkait pelanggaran kode etika sebagai pegawai negeri sipil.
*Mulai mencla-mencle*. Padahal, laporan mereka itu *diproses oleh KASN di jalur radikalisme. Bukan jalur pelanggaran etika*. Laporan mereka ke KASN disampaikan kepada Menkominfo *Johnny G Plate sebagai Koordinator Tim Satgas Radikalisme*. Ini mau kalian bantah? Kurang ‘clear’ apalagi bahwa kalian melaporkan Pak Din soal radikalisme?
Tidak usah jauh-jauh. *Nama kelompok Anda saja Gerakan Anti Radikalisme*. Apa iya kalian mengurusi aparatur negara yang melanggar kode etik dengan nama organiasi yang menyertakan kata ‘radikalisme’? *GAR ITB, Anda janganlah plintat-pintut*.
Selain plintat-plintut, *GAR juga sibuk melepaskan diri dari nama ITB yang mereka bawa-bawa*. Bantah itu, bantah ini. Sekarang mereka mengatakan bahwa GAR ITB tidak berada di bawah ITB atau di bawah Ikatan Alumni (IA) ITB.
Tapi, mengapa sejak awal dibawa-bawa nama ITB? Apa tujuan Anda?
*GAR ITB terbirit-birit setelah banyak orang, termasuk para pejabat tinggi pemerintah, menolak labelisasi bahwa Pak Din seorang yang radikal*. Menko Polhukam Mahfud MD saja menegaskan bahwa Din Syamsuddin tidak memiliki pandangan radikal.
Selain Mahfud, Prof Azyumardi Azra, pimpinan PBNU dan bahkan Menag Yakut Qoumas pun tak sependapat kalau Pak Din dicap radikal.
Ada yang agak lucu. Jurubicara GAR ITB Shinta Madesari mengatakan bahwa Mahfud mungkin belum membaca laporan mereka ke KASN. Kelihatannya, yang benar adalah *Anda (jubir GAR) dan semua pendukung GAR ITB tidak pernah membaca riwayat Pak Din Syamsuddin. Asal tuding radikal. Tanpa mencermati kiprah tokoh dialog antar umat beragama itu*.
Saking intensifnya Pak Din terlibat dalam dialog panjang antarumat beragama itu, sampai-sampai banyak orang menyangka beliau orang liberal. Pak Din berteman dan bermitra dengan banyak tokoh internasional dari agama-agama besar dunia.
Kalau semua orang bersaksi bahwa Pak Din bukan orang radikal, *berarti GAR ITB telah melakukan ujaran kebencian. Sekaligus membuat dan menyebarkan hoax tentang mantan ketua MUI itu.*
Tentu ini *ada konsekuensi hukum yang harus dipikul oleh GAR ITB*.[]
15 Februari 2021
(Penulis wartawan senior)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Difference Between LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 Home Edition (#31313) and LEGO MINDSTORMS Education EV3 (#45544)

http://robotsquare.com/2013/11/25/difference-between-ev3-home-edition-and-education-ev3/ This article covers the difference between the LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 Home Edition and LEGO MINDSTORMS Education EV3 products. Other articles in the ‘difference between’ series: * The difference and compatibility between EV3 and NXT ( link ) * The difference between NXT Home Edition and NXT Education products ( link ) One robotics platform, two targets The LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 robotics platform has been developed for two different target audiences. We have home users (children and hobbyists) and educational users (students and teachers). LEGO has designed a base set for each group, as well as several add on sets. There isn’t a clear line between home users and educational users, though. It’s fine to use the Education set at home, and it’s fine to use the Home Edition set at school. This article aims to clarify the differences between the two product lines so you can decide which

Let’s ban PowerPoint in lectures – it makes students more stupid and professors more boring

https://theconversation.com/lets-ban-powerpoint-in-lectures-it-makes-students-more-stupid-and-professors-more-boring-36183 Reading bullet points off a screen doesn't teach anyone anything. Author Bent Meier Sørensen Professor in Philosophy and Business at Copenhagen Business School Disclosure Statement Bent Meier Sørensen does not work for, consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations. The Conversation is funded by CSIRO, Melbourne, Monash, RMIT, UTS, UWA, ACU, ANU, ASB, Baker IDI, Canberra, CDU, Curtin, Deakin, ECU, Flinders, Griffith, the Harry Perkins Institute, JCU, La Trobe, Massey, Murdoch, Newcastle, UQ, QUT, SAHMRI, Swinburne, Sydney, UNDA, UNE, UniSA, UNSW, USC, USQ, UTAS, UWS, VU and Wollongong.

Logic Analyzer with STM32 Boards

https://sysprogs.com/w/how-we-turned-8-popular-stm32-boards-into-powerful-logic-analyzers/ How We Turned 8 Popular STM32 Boards into Powerful Logic Analyzers March 23, 2017 Ivan Shcherbakov The idea of making a “soft logic analyzer” that will run on top of popular prototyping boards has been crossing my mind since we first got acquainted with the STM32 Discovery and Nucleo boards. The STM32 GPIO is blazingly fast and the built-in DMA controller looks powerful enough to handle high bandwidths. So having that in mind, we spent several months perfecting both software and firmware side and here is what we got in the end. Capturing the signals The main challenge when using a microcontroller like STM32 as a core of a logic analyzer is dealing with sampling irregularities. Unlike FPGA-based analyzers, the microcontroller has to share the same resources to load instructions from memory, read/write the program state and capture the external inputs from the G