Skip to main content

Pandangan Menag tentang Syiah Belum Berubah

http://www.jpnn.com/read/2012/01/25/115290/Pandangan-Menag-tentang-Syiah-Belum-Berubah
Pandangan Menag tentang Syiah Belum Berubah

JAKARTA - Menteri Agama, Suryadharma Ali (SDA) menyatakan menurut
sejumlah literatur yang dikeluarkan oleh Kementerian Agama, MUI dan
Majelis Mujahidin Indonesia, golongan Syiah tidak sesuai dengan ajaran
Islam.

Sejumlah literatur tentang Syiah itu, menurut SDA, tentunya akan
dijadikan pedoman oleh Kementerian Agama dalam menyikapi Syiah.

"Kementerian akan berpegang pada keputusan yang lama, yakni Surat Edaran
Kementerian Agama (Kemenag) Nomor D/BA.01/4865/1983, tanggal 5 Desember
1983, mengenai golongan Syiah, yang menyatakan bahwa golongan Syiah
tidak sesuai dengan ajaran Islam," kata SDA, usai mengikuti rapat kerja
dengan Komisi VIII DPR, di gedung DPR, Senayan Jakarta, Rabu (25/01).

Selain berpegang pada SE Kemenag tertanggal Desember 1983, SDA juga
mempedomi hasil rapat kerja nasional (Rakernas) Majelis Ulama Indonesia
(MUI) pada 7 Maret 1984 di Jakarta. "Rakernas MUI saat itu
merekomendasikan agar umat Islam waspada terhadap menyusupnya paham Syiah."

Demikian juga halnya dengan Surat Keputusan PBNU dengan Nomor
724/A.II.03/10/1997 pada 14 Oktober 1997, ditandatangani oleh KH M Ilyas
Ruhiyat dan Khatib Aam KH M Dawam Anwar.

Lebih lanjut, SDA juga merujuk pada keputusan ormas Islam seperti
Majelis Mujahidin Indonesia yang menyebutkan 17 kekeliruan paham syiah.
Salah satunya soal jumlah ayat dalam Al-quran. "Menurut paham Syiah ada
17 ribu ayat, bukan 6.666 ayat," katanya.

Dalam keputusannya, Majelis Mujahidin menyebutkan bahwa Syiah bukan dari
golongan Islam. "Siapa saja yang tidak menganggap Syiah sesat berarti
dia sesat. Begitu bunyi keputusan Majelis Mujahidin yang dikutip oleh
Kementerian Agama," imbuh SDA.

"Sungguhpun demikian, Kementerian Agama juga akan mengambil inisiatif
mengumpulkan seluruh informasi dulu," tegas Ketua Umum Partai PPP itu.
(fas/jpnn)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Difference Between LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 Home Edition (#31313) and LEGO MINDSTORMS Education EV3 (#45544)

http://robotsquare.com/2013/11/25/difference-between-ev3-home-edition-and-education-ev3/ This article covers the difference between the LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 Home Edition and LEGO MINDSTORMS Education EV3 products. Other articles in the ‘difference between’ series: * The difference and compatibility between EV3 and NXT ( link ) * The difference between NXT Home Edition and NXT Education products ( link ) One robotics platform, two targets The LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 robotics platform has been developed for two different target audiences. We have home users (children and hobbyists) and educational users (students and teachers). LEGO has designed a base set for each group, as well as several add on sets. There isn’t a clear line between home users and educational users, though. It’s fine to use the Education set at home, and it’s fine to use the Home Edition set at school. This article aims to clarify the differences between the two product lines so you can decide which

Let’s ban PowerPoint in lectures – it makes students more stupid and professors more boring

https://theconversation.com/lets-ban-powerpoint-in-lectures-it-makes-students-more-stupid-and-professors-more-boring-36183 Reading bullet points off a screen doesn't teach anyone anything. Author Bent Meier Sørensen Professor in Philosophy and Business at Copenhagen Business School Disclosure Statement Bent Meier Sørensen does not work for, consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations. The Conversation is funded by CSIRO, Melbourne, Monash, RMIT, UTS, UWA, ACU, ANU, ASB, Baker IDI, Canberra, CDU, Curtin, Deakin, ECU, Flinders, Griffith, the Harry Perkins Institute, JCU, La Trobe, Massey, Murdoch, Newcastle, UQ, QUT, SAHMRI, Swinburne, Sydney, UNDA, UNE, UniSA, UNSW, USC, USQ, UTAS, UWS, VU and Wollongong.

Logic Analyzer with STM32 Boards

https://sysprogs.com/w/how-we-turned-8-popular-stm32-boards-into-powerful-logic-analyzers/ How We Turned 8 Popular STM32 Boards into Powerful Logic Analyzers March 23, 2017 Ivan Shcherbakov The idea of making a “soft logic analyzer” that will run on top of popular prototyping boards has been crossing my mind since we first got acquainted with the STM32 Discovery and Nucleo boards. The STM32 GPIO is blazingly fast and the built-in DMA controller looks powerful enough to handle high bandwidths. So having that in mind, we spent several months perfecting both software and firmware side and here is what we got in the end. Capturing the signals The main challenge when using a microcontroller like STM32 as a core of a logic analyzer is dealing with sampling irregularities. Unlike FPGA-based analyzers, the microcontroller has to share the same resources to load instructions from memory, read/write the program state and capture the external inputs from the G