Skip to main content

Caleg Gagal Minta Uang Sumbangan untuk Masjid Dikembalikan

http://regional.kompas.com/read/2014/04/10/1704078/Tak.Dapat.Suara.Caleg...
NUNUKAN, KOMPAS.com — Muhammad Jafar, calon anggota legislatif nomor 7 dari Partai Keadilan Sejahtera (PKS), untuk DPRD Kabupaten Nunukan, Kalimantan Utara, meminta kembali dana “politik uang” yang disebarnya saat masa tenang.
Tuntutan itu disampaikannya setelah mengetahui perolehan suaranya di TPS 7, Kampung Nelayan Mansapa, Nunukan, hanya dua suara.
Kaharuddin, warga Kampung Nelayan Mansapa, yang ditugasi menyebarkan dana politik uang mengaku terpaksa mengganti uang yang telah diberikan kepada sejumlah warga karena malu menagih kepada warga.
“Dia memberikan saya 23 amplop masing-masing berisi Rp 150.000. Jadi jumlahnya semua Rp 3,45 juta. Dia ngomong minta bantu dicarikan suara di TPS 07 Perumahan Nelayan, Desa Mansapa," kata Kaharuddin, Kamis (10/4/2014).
"Setelah menerima uang, saya serahkan kepada warga sejumlah 27 orang. Saya terpaksa nombok Rp 600.000 karena ada empat warga lagi minta kepada saya,” sambungnya.
Sehari pascapelaksanaan Pemilu 2014, Kaharuddin mengaku mendapat pesan singkat seluler dari Muhammad Jafar yang meminta pengembalian uang kerena Jafar hanya mendapat dua suara di TPS itu.
“Saya telepon dia, dia minta kembali uangnya. Tadi pagi ada suruhan dia mau ngambil uang, tapi tidak saya kasih karena saya mau mengembalikan sendiri,” ujar Kaharuddin.
"Saya enggak mau harga diri saya hilang. Saya tidak mau malu dengan menagih masyarakat. Lebih baik saya bertanggung jawab mengembalikan uang," kata dia lagi.
Menurut Kaharuddin, sebenarnya tidak ada perjanjian bahwa uang harus kembali jika prediksi perolehan suara meleset. "Dia seorang pengusaha rumput laut, saya cuma nelayan rumput laut. Saya takut,” ungkap Kaharuddin.
Dikonfirmasi Kompas.com, caleg PKS Muhammad Jafar mengakui meminta kembali dana money politics karena kecewa tidak ada pemilih di TPS 07 Kampung Nelayan Mansapa. Dia mengakui telah memberikan uang kepada Kaharuddin karena sebelumnya ada jaminan akan mendapat 23 suara di TPS 07. Uang sebesar Rp 3,4 juta lebih itu dibagi dalam 23 amplop yang masing-masing berisi Rp 150.000.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Difference Between LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 Home Edition (#31313) and LEGO MINDSTORMS Education EV3 (#45544)

http://robotsquare.com/2013/11/25/difference-between-ev3-home-edition-and-education-ev3/ This article covers the difference between the LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 Home Edition and LEGO MINDSTORMS Education EV3 products. Other articles in the ‘difference between’ series: * The difference and compatibility between EV3 and NXT ( link ) * The difference between NXT Home Edition and NXT Education products ( link ) One robotics platform, two targets The LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 robotics platform has been developed for two different target audiences. We have home users (children and hobbyists) and educational users (students and teachers). LEGO has designed a base set for each group, as well as several add on sets. There isn’t a clear line between home users and educational users, though. It’s fine to use the Education set at home, and it’s fine to use the Home Edition set at school. This article aims to clarify the differences between the two product lines so you can decide which

Let’s ban PowerPoint in lectures – it makes students more stupid and professors more boring

https://theconversation.com/lets-ban-powerpoint-in-lectures-it-makes-students-more-stupid-and-professors-more-boring-36183 Reading bullet points off a screen doesn't teach anyone anything. Author Bent Meier Sørensen Professor in Philosophy and Business at Copenhagen Business School Disclosure Statement Bent Meier Sørensen does not work for, consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations. The Conversation is funded by CSIRO, Melbourne, Monash, RMIT, UTS, UWA, ACU, ANU, ASB, Baker IDI, Canberra, CDU, Curtin, Deakin, ECU, Flinders, Griffith, the Harry Perkins Institute, JCU, La Trobe, Massey, Murdoch, Newcastle, UQ, QUT, SAHMRI, Swinburne, Sydney, UNDA, UNE, UniSA, UNSW, USC, USQ, UTAS, UWS, VU and Wollongong.

Logic Analyzer with STM32 Boards

https://sysprogs.com/w/how-we-turned-8-popular-stm32-boards-into-powerful-logic-analyzers/ How We Turned 8 Popular STM32 Boards into Powerful Logic Analyzers March 23, 2017 Ivan Shcherbakov The idea of making a “soft logic analyzer” that will run on top of popular prototyping boards has been crossing my mind since we first got acquainted with the STM32 Discovery and Nucleo boards. The STM32 GPIO is blazingly fast and the built-in DMA controller looks powerful enough to handle high bandwidths. So having that in mind, we spent several months perfecting both software and firmware side and here is what we got in the end. Capturing the signals The main challenge when using a microcontroller like STM32 as a core of a logic analyzer is dealing with sampling irregularities. Unlike FPGA-based analyzers, the microcontroller has to share the same resources to load instructions from memory, read/write the program state and capture the external inputs from the G