Skip to main content

World's Most Literate Nations Ranked

 https://webcapp.ccsu.edu/?news=1767&data

 

CCSU NEWS RELEASE

WORLD’S MOST LITERATE NATIONS RANKED     For Release: March 9, 2016

NEW BRITAIN, CT:  The World’s Most Literate Nations (WMLN) study, the first to analyze large-scale trends in literate behavior and literacy in more than 60 countries, finds the Nordic countries (Finland, Norway, Iceland, Denmark, and Sweden,) are among the five most literate nations in the world, while the U.S. and Canada rank 7th and 11th respectively.

The study, conducted by John W. Miller, president of Central Connecticut State University in New Britain, CT., is used as a lens to view literate behaviors and their supporting resources -- five categories such as size and number of libraries and newspaper readership.

“The power of literacy and the value of being part of a literate world is often taken for granted,” observes Miller. Much of his academic work during the past 40 years has been devoted to literacy issues. For the past 12 years, he produced the highly regarded “America’s Most Literate Cities” survey (2003-2014), in collaboration with CCSU’s Center for Public Policy and Social Research. The team examined data for 200 countries, but due to lack of relevant statistics, only 61 made the cut.

“The factors we examined present a complex and nuanced portrait of a nation’s cultural vitality, and what the rankings strongly suggest and world literacy demonstrates,” Miller explains, “is that these kinds of literate behaviors are critical to the success of individuals and nations in the knowledge-based economics that define our global future.”

HOW NATIONS RANKED

Country

Rank

Country

Rank

Country

Rank

Finland

1

Malta

21

Romania

41

Norway

2

South Korea

22

Portugal

42

Iceland

3

Czech Republic

23

Brazil

43

Denmark

4

Ireland

24

Croatia

44

Sweden

5

Italy

25

Qatar

45

Switzerland

6

Austria

26

Costa Rica

46

United States

7

Russia

27

Argentina

47

Germany

8

Slovenia

28

Mauritius

48

Latvia

9

Hungary

29

Serbia

49

Netherlands

10

Slovak Republic

30

Turkey

50

Canada

11

Lithuania

31

Georgia

51

France

12

Japan

32

Tunisia

52

Luxembourg

13

Cyprus

33

Malaysia

53

Estonia

14

Bulgaria

34

Albania

54

New Zealand

15

Spain

35

Panama

55

Australia

16

Singapore

36

South Africa

56

United Kingdom

17

Chile

37

Colombia

57

Belgium

18

Mexico

38

Morocco

58

Israel

19

China

39

Thailand

59

Poland

20

Greece

40

Indonesia

60

 

 

 

 

Botswana

61

 METHODOLOGY

Miller’s study synthesizes two types of variables: literacy achievement tests (PIRLS – Progress in International Reading Literacy Study and PISA – Programme for International Student Assessment) and literate behavior characteristics (population, newspapers, libraries, years of schooling). For details on methodology, go to www.ccsu.edu/WMLN.

 A companion book, “World Literacy: How Countries Rank And Why It Matters” (Routledge, 2016) authored by Miller and Michael C. McKenna, provides an extended analysis of many of the factors involved in this study and may be helpful in interpreting the results.

 “The factors we examine present a complex and nuanced portrait of a nation’s cultural vitality,” says Miller. “And what the rankings strongly suggest and world literacy demonstrates is that these kinds of literate behaviors are critical to the success of individuals and nations in the knowledge-based economies that define our global future.”

TRENDS

One consistent finding, according to Miller, is that “there is no meaningful correlation between years of compulsory schooling and educational expenditures on the one hand and test scores on the other.

 Finland, Norway, Iceland, Denmark, and Sweden earn the five top slots in the study, largely because “their monolithic culture values reading,” Miller says.

 He also points out that the rankings would be “very different” if educational outputs (PIRLS and PISA) were the only indices used. “The Pacific Rim countries, Singapore, South Korea, Japan, and China, would top the list if test performance was the only measure. Finland would be the only non-Pacific Rim country to rank high,” he states, and adds, “When factors such as library size and accessibility are added in, the Pacific Rim nations drop dramatically.”

 The Western Hemisphere countries do not fare well overall in the study. Mexico ranks 38th, Brazil 43rd, and Costa Rica comes in at 46th. For the U.S., Miller says, while the years of compulsory education have increased, the practice of literate behaviors has decreased, and the ability to read stays relatively the same. “It is not so much that we are slowing down in this world race, but rather that others are speeding up,” he emphasizes.

The complete rankings are available online at www.ccsu.edu/wmln.

###

Contact:

Mark McLaughlin, Assoc. VP of Marketing & Communications, 860.832.0065, mclaughlinm@ccsu.edu

Janice Palmer, Media Relations Officer, 860.832.1791, 860.538.2649, palmerj@ccsu.edu

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Difference Between LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 Home Edition (#31313) and LEGO MINDSTORMS Education EV3 (#45544)

http://robotsquare.com/2013/11/25/difference-between-ev3-home-edition-and-education-ev3/ This article covers the difference between the LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 Home Edition and LEGO MINDSTORMS Education EV3 products. Other articles in the ‘difference between’ series: * The difference and compatibility between EV3 and NXT ( link ) * The difference between NXT Home Edition and NXT Education products ( link ) One robotics platform, two targets The LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 robotics platform has been developed for two different target audiences. We have home users (children and hobbyists) and educational users (students and teachers). LEGO has designed a base set for each group, as well as several add on sets. There isn’t a clear line between home users and educational users, though. It’s fine to use the Education set at home, and it’s fine to use the Home Edition set at school. This article aims to clarify the differences between the two product lines so you can decide which

Let’s ban PowerPoint in lectures – it makes students more stupid and professors more boring

https://theconversation.com/lets-ban-powerpoint-in-lectures-it-makes-students-more-stupid-and-professors-more-boring-36183 Reading bullet points off a screen doesn't teach anyone anything. Author Bent Meier Sørensen Professor in Philosophy and Business at Copenhagen Business School Disclosure Statement Bent Meier Sørensen does not work for, consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations. The Conversation is funded by CSIRO, Melbourne, Monash, RMIT, UTS, UWA, ACU, ANU, ASB, Baker IDI, Canberra, CDU, Curtin, Deakin, ECU, Flinders, Griffith, the Harry Perkins Institute, JCU, La Trobe, Massey, Murdoch, Newcastle, UQ, QUT, SAHMRI, Swinburne, Sydney, UNDA, UNE, UniSA, UNSW, USC, USQ, UTAS, UWS, VU and Wollongong.

Building a portable GSM BTS using the Nuand bladeRF, Raspberry Pi and YateBTS (The Definitive and Step by Step Guide)

https://blog.strcpy.info/2016/04/21/building-a-portable-gsm-bts-using-bladerf-raspberry-and-yatebts-the-definitive-guide/ Building a portable GSM BTS using the Nuand bladeRF, Raspberry Pi and YateBTS (The Definitive and Step by Step Guide) I was always amazed when I read articles published by some hackers related to GSM technology. H owever , playing with GSM technologies was not cheap until the arrival of Software Defined Radios (SDRs), besides not being something easy to be implemented. A fter reading various articles related to GSM BTS, I noticed that there were a lot of inconsistent and or incomplete information related to the topic. From this, I decided to write this article, detailing and describing step by step the building process of a portable and operational GSM BTS. Before starting with the “hands on”, I would like to thank all the pioneering Hackers and Researchers who started the studies related to previously closed GSM technology. In particul